A rope-access website that compares itself with the rival method
The name is the trade's founding rule — never one rope, a working line and a backup, two independent anchor points — and the same rule is the site's only graphic device: two thin vertical rules run down the left of every section, and nothing else is needed. The mechanism prices rope access alongside scaffolding on the client's own building, over the same square metres, and returns one of four verdicts. For window cleaning it says scaffolding makes no sense; for painting 2,500 m² it says the rope is 74,000 złoty cheaper but will take six days longer — the one real drawback of the method, and no reason to hide it; and for external insulation it answers "we won't take this job" and shows the scaffolding figure only, so the client knows what money is involved before going looking for a contractor. Without that single refusal the whole comparison would be advertising. A separate section gives two dates worth asking any firm for: the expiry of the safety-equipment inspection and of the liability policy, each with a day counter driven by the server clock and a red warning sixty days out. The winning column is marked server-side, so the page still delivers its verdict with JavaScript off rather than two equal columns. What stays manual is the inspection date — without a current one, working at height is simply illegal, and a page showing a date from two years ago tells the client exactly what it should not.
